The law, which was co-sponsored by Massie and Khanna, was enacted to increase transparency and accountability within federal agencies regarding their use of biometric data collection technologies. The law requires federal agencies to submit annual reports to Congress, detailing their use of facial recognition technology, including the number of searches conducted, the number of positive identifications made, and the number of false positives.

Alleged Non-Compliance by the DOJ

According to Massie and Khanna, the Department of Justice has failed to comply with the transparency law by not providing the required information in their annual reports. The representatives claim that the DOJ has not provided detailed information about their use of facial recognition technology, including the number of searches conducted and the number of positive identifications made. This lack of transparency has raised concerns about the potential misuse of biometric data collection technologies and the impact on individual privacy and civil liberties.

Massie and Khanna have stated that they will continue to push for compliance with the transparency law, citing the importance of accountability and transparency within federal agencies. They argue that the use of biometric data collection technologies has significant implications for individual privacy and civil liberties, and that it is essential for federal agencies to be transparent about their use of these technologies.

Implications of Non-Compliance

The alleged non-compliance by the DOJ has significant implications for individual privacy and civil liberties. The use of facial recognition technology and other biometric data collection methods has raised concerns about the potential for mass surveillance and the erosion of individual privacy. If federal agencies are not transparent about their use of these technologies, it is difficult to hold them accountable for any potential misuse.

Furthermore, the lack of transparency can also undermine trust in government and law enforcement agencies. If individuals feel that their personal data is being collected and used without their knowledge or consent, it can lead to a breakdown in trust and a lack of cooperation with law enforcement agencies.

Call for Greater Transparency and Accountability

Massie and Khanna are calling for greater transparency and accountability within federal agencies regarding their use of biometric data collection technologies. They argue that federal agencies must be transparent about their use of these technologies, including the number of searches conducted, the number of positive identifications made, and the number of false positives.

In addition to transparency, Massie and Khanna are also calling for greater accountability within federal agencies. They argue that federal agencies must be held accountable for any potential misuse of biometric data collection technologies, and that individuals must have recourse if their personal data is collected or used without their knowledge or consent.

The representatives are also calling for the establishment of clear guidelines and regulations regarding the use of biometric data collection technologies. They argue that federal agencies must have clear guidelines and regulations in place to ensure that these technologies are used in a responsible and transparent manner.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the alleged non-compliance by the DOJ with the transparency law has significant implications for individual privacy and civil liberties. The use of facial recognition technology and other biometric data collection methods has raised concerns about the potential for mass surveillance and the erosion of individual privacy. It is essential for federal agencies to be transparent about their use of these technologies, and for individuals to have recourse if their personal data is collected or used without their knowledge or consent.

Massie and Khanna's efforts to push for compliance with the transparency law are an important step towards ensuring that federal agencies are held accountable for their use of biometric data collection technologies. By calling for greater transparency and accountability, the representatives are working to protect individual privacy and civil liberties, and to ensure that federal agencies use these technologies in a responsible and transparent manner.